General Forums >> Firearms And Other Weapons

Pages: 1
AHV
Apostle of Humility


Reged: Jan 03 2001
Posts: 11
Loc: Wrightwood, CA USA
204 or 22 250
      #1893940 - Mon Aug 25 2008 08:20 AM

I have been using my .17 Remington for several years. It shoots excellent, but unfortunately I live in California and hunt sometimes in the new lead free condor zone.

I suspect it's going to be a while before we see non lead ammo produced for the .17. I called several ammo manufactures. Nothing yet.

So, maybe an excuse to buy a new gun. I'm thinking the 204 or a 22 250.

I salvage the fur, so that's why I like the .17.

Suggestions on caliber and rifle manufactures???

Thanks,

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Moon DogAdministrator
Administrator / Grand Ayatollah
****

Reged: Sep 28 2000
Posts: 1422
Loc: Mc Neal, AZ
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: AHV]
      #1893941 - Mon Aug 25 2008 08:34 AM

AHV,

ALL of the major and most of the minor manufacturers of rifles chamber in .204 Ruger and .22-250, take your pick.

If you have not already considered it I suggest you check out the Calhoon website and consider either the 19 calhoon or the 19 Badger. I have friends that shoot these for called coyotes and are impressed by the lethality and the fur friendliness of the cartridges.

If you stick to your first choices I would recommend the .204 over the .22-250 for called coyotes under 150 yards. I would recommend a
cz 527 in the "American" sporter barrel contour as an almost ideal calling rifle.

--------------------
Moon Dog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AHV
Apostle of Humility


Reged: Jan 03 2001
Posts: 11
Loc: Wrightwood, CA USA
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: Moon Dog]
      #1893942 - Mon Aug 25 2008 10:43 AM

Moon Dog,

Thanks for your reply. I talked to Calhoon and unfortunetely the .19 is not going to help my non lead challenge. He suggested the .204 as the next best solution.

Thanks,

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Moon DogAdministrator
Administrator / Grand Ayatollah
****

Reged: Sep 28 2000
Posts: 1422
Loc: Mc Neal, AZ
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: AHV]
      #1893943 - Mon Aug 25 2008 10:54 AM

Well,

There you go, I guess I dropped the line of your post about non lead bullets.

California is a pretty good size market, I can't believe that Remington/Winchester/Hornady, et al won;t bring out a suitable choice in non lead bullets.

Might have to use a slower velocity load to keep it in bounds of fur friendly.

--------------------
Moon Dog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AHV
Apostle of Humility


Reged: Jan 03 2001
Posts: 11
Loc: Wrightwood, CA USA
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: Moon Dog]
      #1893944 - Mon Aug 25 2008 11:34 AM

All that I spoke with say they are working on it, but of course they will start with the most popular calibers.

Barnes makes a 26 grain VG that I can use for the .204.
Remington came out with a new model 7 predator that weighs only 7 lbs, and all my Remington rifles shoot great, so I'll probably go that route for now.

The info I read on the Calhoon Badger sounds very interesting and I may pick one up later.

Thanks Again,

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
disco1946
Mouse Dipper
***

Reged: Jul 01 2007
Posts: 675
Loc: Mesa, Arizona
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: AHV]
      #1893945 - Mon Aug 25 2008 12:48 PM

AHV

They ain't never gonna come up with no Lead free .17 cal bullets, so maybe you oughta send me that .17 Remmy and I will send you a hunnert dollars american so's It won't be no total loss for you.


Dave

--------------------
Friends don't let Friends shoot Rugers


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AHV
Apostle of Humility


Reged: Jan 03 2001
Posts: 11
Loc: Wrightwood, CA USA
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: AHV]
      #1893946 - Mon Aug 25 2008 01:05 PM

You may be right about no lead free .17 bullets, so I'll use it when I hunt in Arizona!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark PAdministrator
Administrator
***

Reged: Jun 21 2005
Posts: 1020
Loc: Arizona
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: disco1946]
      #1893947 - Mon Aug 25 2008 01:06 PM

If it were me I'd ask the game and fish dept if a ".172 caliber 25gr Berger non-MEF bullet" satisfied the requirements of the lead free zone. You might get lucky and get the right goober over there that will read "non-MEF" and since they don't know what that means, give you the go ahead. Then just carry that paper in your pocket and shoot 'em up.

--------------------
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kevthebassman
Disciple
****

Reged: Feb 04 2007
Posts: 321
Loc: Eureka, MO
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: Mark P]
      #1893948 - Mon Aug 25 2008 05:55 PM

Hell mark, now you know better'n that. The California Department of Game and Fish is located in the broom closet of the PETA headquarters. One pimple-faced anorexic pre-pubescent teenager (who has watched "Bambi" 4,000 times) runs the whole show.
























Ok, maybe not, but some of their policies sure seem that way.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Saddle
Druid


Reged: Sep 26 2003
Posts: 159
Loc: Tucson, Arizona Territory
Re: 204 or 22 250 [Re: AHV]
      #1894212 - Wed Oct 01 2008 02:49 PM

Barnes makes a 37 grain non lead 22 cal bullet I have been using in my triple duece for some time. It is very fur friendly and more than accurate enough for called coyotes. Although I live in Arizona I, like you, hunt with a friend in Calif. so I developed a load with this bullet to meet any requirments we might face. I did not use this bullet on prairie dogs this year in my 22-250 but would feel confortable if I had to although I think it would shorten my effective range somewhat.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 946

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us CoyoteGods

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Generated in 0.067 seconds in which 0.039 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression enabled.